Blasphemous Libel is too stupid for words
I was going to post a well researched piece called ‘The 10 reasons why God, and any tard that believes in him, is a complete cunt’.
But then I saw the new Defamation Bill which makes Blasphemous Libel a crime. I capitalised it because it’s so important. I thought to myself ‘Goodness, if I blaspheme then I could be in serious bother. Someone might sue me for the hurt I have caused them and take every last penny I have. And I don’t have too many pennies’.
But then, right, I got to thinking that if I call God a cunt then it’s not libel, as I don’t think calling someone a cunt is libel. Unless that person wants to get really pedantic, proving in court that they are actually a woman’s front bottom. So God is a cunt. And Dermot Ahern is a cunt. Show me your labia, Dermot, and I’ll happily retract. Until then you’re a fucking cunt.
But let’s say I say all Catholics are cunts. Still not libel. If I say all Catholics are child molesters that’s probably the right kind of territory but how is that going to work? Are ALL Catholics going to sue me for blasphemous libel? A class action suit against lil ol’ me? Unlikely.
And if we accept that God or Gods or whatever do exist, and I realise that I’m asking you to believe in something which is about as likely as the Tooth Fairy, but exist in a different plane from the rest of us, how can they use human laws when they’re Gods? And Jesus, you can’t libel Jesus. He’s dead. You can’t libel the dead.
If I got a TV sketch show and I had a character called Shylock McGinty, the loveable one-legged Jew from the Liberties who was an alcoholic but had a really big nose and was somewhat miserly with his money, would that open me up to this new bill? I don’t think so. It’d be simply rehashing old stereotypes about religions, it’s not blaspheming.
And if we accept diversity in what people think and believe then surely we have to accept that what might be good for the Jewish goose is not as good for the Muslim gander?
What exactly do you have to do blaspheme? How can they prove it’s actually blasphemous? And what’s stopping me, should I be prosecuted under this bill, from setting up my own religion which has a fundamental teaching that being sued for blasphemous libel is blasphemous to my own religion, thus seeing me counter-sue and we have a vicious, blasphemous circle?
I have no doubt at all this is one of the most stupid, archaic, pointless and nonsensical pieces of legislation I have ever seen. It’s making other countries laugh at us. Even ones full of radical Islamists who we know don’t find anything but chopping people’s heads off funny.
But surely nobody is ever going to get prosecuted under it. Are they?


