To stick with the positive theme…
…I have to say I was cheered by the fact that Joe O’Reilly lost his appeal.
I’m cheered by the fact he’s going to spend years in jail. Happy that his dead wife’s family can get on with their lives.
Delighted that his lover will be ‘deprived’ of her man. And fucking chuffed that in a time when it seems every cunt can get away with anything they like, that one cunt got what he deserved.
A bit of Shawshank Redemption style laundry room, unlubed, tea-towel holder tearing fun with the big boys and I’d almost start to believe in God.
I hope it hurts, Joe, you poxy cunt.
March 6th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
Well said Twenty. I am genuinely relieved that, at a time when all is going horribly wrong in this country, at least some people get what they deserve. Seeing photos of Rachel O’Reilly’s family after the verdict really highlighted just how much that awful bastard ruined so many lives.
March 6th, 2009 at 3:02 pm
I was just wondering about that case yesterday, actually.
Somehow, the worst bit for me was that he left his three year old alone downstairs watching a video, liable to go up and find his mother’s body at any time.
In my naivety, I used to think appeals were for innocent people.
Not so the guilty could get off on manufactured technicalities.
March 6th, 2009 at 3:24 pm
A good friend of mine,worked with a guy.THis Guy new The O’Reilly’s,so well infact that he was questioned a few times.
From what I heard,this act was completely out of the blue,as far as anyone outside the family was concerned.
At least if he was a psychopath,it would explain something.The fact that he tried to get his conviction quashed on a technicality just shows what kind of a cowardly,arrogant cunt,murderer he is..
I hope his one lane highway gets widened to a dual-carriageway in Prison..If it has been already..
March 6th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
Is that true Jo? I thought she was alone at the time.
Regardless, he deserves to be raped everyday for the rest of his life
March 6th, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Jo, that was a different murdering bastard, I’m afraid.
He,too, is in prison, and I hope he dies there of a horrible, lingering, painful disease, along with Joe O’Reilly!
March 6th, 2009 at 4:45 pm
I spoke on the phone with his “lover” while the trial was on. Didn’t realise who she was at the time. If only!
March 6th, 2009 at 4:48 pm
fill3rup:
March 6th, 2009 at 3:24 pm
“I hope his one lane highway gets widened to a dual-carriageway in Prison..If it has been already..”
Any decent person feels regret at the pain O’Reilly has caused so many people and the harm he has done them – and himself.
When I read about acts like his, I always wonder could any of us have found ourselves in his boots – there but for the grace of whatever goes any of us and so forth.
To take vicarious pleasure in vicious criminals committing vile acts of male rape says a lot about the kind of sick fuck fill3rup is. Rape is rape, irrespective of what the victim has done. In fact, only murder ranks worse than it as a crime.
March 6th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
When I read about acts like his, I always wonder could any of us have found ourselves in his boots – there but for the grace of whatever goes any of us and so forth.
You’re taking the piss, right?
March 6th, 2009 at 4:55 pm
????
March 6th, 2009 at 4:58 pm
His arse will heal up “Hugh”
A mother,Daughter and sister is in a box 6 feet under and family is detroyed,actually 2 counting his family.
What kind of a sick fuck makes excuses for a cowardly murder..
BTW you don’t know me and with a bit of luck I will never know you.So easy there with the presumptions fucko..
March 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm
What, any man could “accidently” find himself after murdering his “annoying” wife, made up an alibi, and got his girlfriend to lie for him?
What kind of men do you hang out with??????
March 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm
In fact, only murder ranks worse than it as a crime
Well he’d be getting off light then wouldn’t he?
It should be an eye for eye.
Anyway Hugh, how often do you consider murdering your wife? You might want to talk to someone about that
March 6th, 2009 at 5:04 pm
I’m off to the Pub,I feel Victimised….
..cock..
March 6th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Happy drinking. Make sure you don’t accidentally end up beating your wife to death with a heavy object. I mean, it could happen to any of us
March 6th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
I’m off to the Pub,I feel Victimised….
jammy bastard!
March 6th, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Oops, wrong murdering bastard. What happened to the other one?
March 6th, 2009 at 5:26 pm
I’m not taking the piss out of anyone. And I’m not defending anyone, either.
O’Reilly is where he belongs, in prison. He has properly been given the sentence for which the law provides. There is no provision in Irish law for a person to undergo the punishment of rape.
His victims will not benefit if others, actually vicious criminals who may themselves have committed murder, rape him.
Rape is rape, wherever it is committed.
Now I challenge you Twenty, and all of the rest of you to come right out and say that you approve of and condone rape, or else make it clear that you disapprove of this sickening crime always and under all circumstances.
Fill3rup: Do you condone rape outsider jail as well, or only inside when the victim is a convicted criminal?
As for an eye for an eye, someone a thick cunt like you probably never even heard of once said: “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”
March 6th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
Wait a minute. You said:
When I read about acts like his, I always wonder could any of us have found ourselves in his boots – there but for the grace of whatever goes any of us and so forth.
If he had been a victim, if he’d genuinely come home and found his wife murdered by someone else then that would make sense. As it is you’re suggesting that any of us are capable of bludgeoning our wives/girlfriends/husbands to death with a heavy object.
Then appearing on The Late Late Show with our mother-in-law, full of fake grief, to try and generate sympathy.
You’re saying that any of us could inflict that kind of violence on someone as well as the damage he has done to his two children who know that their father, rather than just divorcing his wife, bashed her head in with a heavy object.
I think it’s quite obvious that’s not true. There but for the grace of whatever, get to fuck.
I couldn’t give a fuck if he got raped in jail. In fact, I’d probably think it served him right, however horrible it is.
And if you think that makes me a sick cunt then fair enough.
March 6th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
As for an eye for an eye, someone a thick cunt like you probably never even heard of once said: “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”
I reckon whoever said that was the thick cunt.
March 6th, 2009 at 5:42 pm
I’ve been following the case and never thought his appeal had the slightest chance of flying. Ditto the one chance he still has in the Supreme Court.
His address for the next 15 years at least will be Dublin Rd., Portlaoise. Because it has the prison on one side and a mental hospital on the other, the road is known locally as Nuts ‘n Bolts Road.
March 6th, 2009 at 5:57 pm
Peadar:
March 6th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
“As for an eye for an eye, someone a thick cunt like you probably never even heard of once said: ‘An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind’
I reckon whoever said that was the thick cunt.”
—
Yes Paedar, if you say so. His name was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Google him.
And I still say no one, repeat no one, deserves to be raped, anywhere, any time. And anyone who derives vicarious pleasure from the thought of anyone, repeat anyone, being raped is himself a sick fuck, just as someone who watches kiddy porn is as sick a fuck as the people who rape kids in those videos.
March 6th, 2009 at 6:07 pm
I don’t get it.
You lot seem to think that you personally need retribution for something you cannot even claim to understand. Yes you can simplify it, as you already have, but that only serves to highlight your total ignorance and stupidity.
Hugh Dunphy is right. His opinion isn’t necessarily the one you hear from arseholes in the pub. It’s an educated opinion, something that’s severly lacking around here.
March 6th, 2009 at 6:09 pm
I think I’d probably wank to a video of Joe Reilly been raped
March 6th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
I don’t personally need it. I couldn’t give a fuck about Joe O’Reilly. My point is that if something bad were to happen to him, I wouldn’t shed any tears.
And Hugh still hasn’t explained in any way satisfactoraly why he thinks ‘There but for the grace of whatever’ go any of us. None of us are vicious, calculating, murderers, nor have we any intention of being one, nor are there circumstances (leaving aside self-defence I’d imagine) where any of us would commit such a crime.
March 6th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
And Hugh still hasn’t explained in any way satisfactoraly why he thinks ‘There but for the grace of whatever’ go any of us.
Cause Hugh’s a nut case. If I was Hughs wife I’d be afraid, very afraid
March 6th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
You should never kill anyone you know, kill a complete stranger far better chance of getting away with it.
March 6th, 2009 at 6:58 pm
Aw come on twenty,have a bit of mercy,at least let them use some lube so that the guys doin the buggering dont hurt their cocks too much.
March 6th, 2009 at 7:10 pm
“And Hugh still hasn’t explained in any way satisfactoraly why he thinks ‘There but for the grace of whatever’ go any of us.”
My sentiment was expressed on an abstract level.
I have no idea what Joe Reilly was like as a child, or whether he was a bad person long before he did the terrible thing he did, but when I think of people like him and the crime he committed, I wonder what happens to make a person go so bad, and whether it might not happen to anyone of us. That’s all. I’m not saying it’s just below the surface in all of us by any means, but just wonder could any of us end up in a spiral that took him to where he ended up. And, I must say, that thought scares me a bit.
In other words, Joe Reilly is a cautionary tale and hopefully it will make us all reflect on our own failings rather than wax righteous and advocate his being subjected to demeaning treatment by other criminals. If we believe people should be raped, then let us have the moral courage to amend the laws of this country and give the courts the power to order that punishment.
–
Peadar:
March 6th, 2009 at 6:09 pm
“I think I’d probably wank to a video of Joe Reilly been raped.”
That doesn’t surprise me at all, Peadar. What other kinds of videos do you wank to?
March 6th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
I’m not racist but Hugh, I think you’re barking up the wrong tree here. We all know what you mean but we’re not listening.
March 6th, 2009 at 7:47 pm
Holemaster:
March 6th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
“I’m not racist but Hugh, I think you’re barking up the wrong tree here.”
?? What has racism got to do with anything here?
And anyone who begins a statement with “I’m not racist but …” is automatically suspect.
Incidentally, I am Irish, white and not a Jew or Muslim or Hindu, but even if I was a Black, Muslim Patagonian gay sheep-shagger, what the fuck would it have to do with anything I have written on this thread today?
“We all know what you mean but we’re not listening.”
We? Who are the “we”, and who mandated you to speak on “we’s” behalf? I’d advise you to try listening now and then, but you’d probably tell me the only time you listened to an arsehole was when you farted.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:00 pm
I’m not a racist either,and i agree with Holemaster..
If O’Reilly gets the high hard one in Jail,it may let him know how his wife felt as he stood there (bollock naked btw) and caved her head in with a dumbbell, then he may reflect on his actions and there is the possibility he might atone inwardly for his crime..
So Hugh,go fuck yourself,I am not condoning Rape,I am saying that the smug cunt deserves to feel the same way as his victim,even if all he’ll get out of it is comstipation and a limp for a few days.
One other question Hugh.If somebody murdered your wife/girlfriend/family memeber,i dont think you’d be on here say “There but for the grace of God”..even if you think you would,if it happened you wouldn’t..so get of your moral high horse and if you have some issues with rape that are personal to you,then go and talk to someone about
it,dont come on here defending murderers…
I dont wish you any ill will but you seem to think that im an bad person..sorry to dissappoint you on that one..you will never know..
March 6th, 2009 at 8:03 pm
My awful spelling and grammar in the last post means i’m worse than Hitler Twenty.Sorry for bringing the tone down..
March 6th, 2009 at 8:18 pm
I think by “we” he means people who come to a humorous blog and enjoy ranting and telling the odd sick joke.Because,ya know,it’s funny.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:21 pm
Ta Lazlo! a bit of sense to the proceedings..
March 6th, 2009 at 8:27 pm
I love you hugh. Your either as mad a fuckin brush or a master subversive, either way keep up the good work and dont mind those cruddies, they just dont appreciate you. As for that cunt o`reilly ooh Im too afraid to go to that dark place in me head….
March 6th, 2009 at 8:29 pm
Every day that he spends in jail he’ll be thinking pf his lover getting it on with every guy who can get it up. Let’s hope that he doesn’t get time off for good behavior or for the state to save some money.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:48 pm
Hugh is right. Not as enertaining as some of the regulars here perhaps. But he is right.
Yiz must know that. The only thing he has got slightly wrong is the overall tone of this blog.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:53 pm
fill3rup:
“So Hugh,go fuck yourself,I am not condoning Rape,I am saying that the smug cunt deserves to feel the same way as his victim,even if all he’ll get out of it is comstipation and a limp for a few days.”
But you ARE condoning rape, and clearly getting off at the thought of it happening to someone. It wouldn’t surprise me if you fantasise about joining in if you were part of a big enough mob.
You remind me a bit of the old skanger women in Britain who used to gather outside a prison when there was a hanging. I’m old enough to remember the newspaper reports. One even took her small child along in her arms and waited until the official posted the bulletin reporting that the condemned man had been despatched. She told a newspaper reporter that she had taken the child along to teach it the difference between “right and wrong”.
You sick fuck, why can’t you accept that O’Reilly has been given the sentence that the law and courts of this land deem fit? That does not include being raped or otherwise physically abused. The only alternative is the rule of the mob, and how do you know how you would fare in a “society” like that?
We either live in a humane society, where even the worst of criminals are treated decently while they are confined in a place where they can’t harm anyone, or we live in a place where sick emotions like yours lead to all kinds of cruelty and atrocities. Ask yourself what kind of prison guard you would have made if you had happened to be born in Germany in the 1920s and found yourself on duty in Treblinka in the 1940s.
I feel sorry for people like you, but then maybe you’re just a hopeless impotent loser who can only get off by playing Madame Defarge.
March 6th, 2009 at 8:59 pm
Ah, here, Jaysus, can I take back my last comment?
This bloke’s a bit of a nutter alright.
Relax there Hubert
March 6th, 2009 at 9:00 pm
You see Twenty! I am Hitler!
March 6th, 2009 at 9:00 pm
You calling me racist Hugh? I said I wasn’t racist. You’re the one bringing race into this.
March 6th, 2009 at 9:02 pm
You sick fuck, why can’t you accept that O’Reilly has been given the sentence that the law and courts of this land deem fit?
I think we have all accepted that. It’s just that we’d like to see him suffer a bit more, because he is a horrible, lying, cheating, murdering piece of shit.
If his time in prison was going to spent doing ‘hard labour’ or something similar then you might say that the physical punishment on top of the time behind bars would, perhaps, be enough.
As he’s going to spent his time, indolent, lazing, growing fat on our taxes, I can understand why people aren’t satisfied with a custodial sentence on its own.
March 6th, 2009 at 9:03 pm
I think being cornholed is a pain in the ass.
March 6th, 2009 at 9:03 pm
You see Twenty! I am Hitler!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
March 6th, 2009 at 9:07 pm
Right, I’m off to drink beer.
Laters, Naziriños.
March 6th, 2009 at 9:18 pm
Twenty Major:
“As he’s going to spent his time, indolent, lazing, growing fat on our taxes, I can understand why people aren’t satisfied with a custodial sentence on its own.”
Fair enough, a very valid sentiment.
However, I believe the main purpose of incarceration should be to protect society from dangerous persons and the secondary purpose possibly, just possibly, to reform and rehabilitate them.
Since we no longer have the death penalty, taxpayers will have to pay for their upkeep in any case and I’m not sure that the overall cost will be greatly affected by whether or not the conditions in which they are kept are humane or inhumane.
If we as a society accept a regime in which prisoners are treated harshly, even sadistically, by prison personnel or other prisoners are allowed to behave brutally towards their fellow-prisoners, then what worries me is hot only the harm this does to some prisoners, but much more the harm it does to ourselves, as a society.
I firmly believe that all punishments meted out to offenders must be enshrined in law. Otherwise, it is mob rule – and we can all see where that leads.
Anyway, Twenty, I repeat “I do not approve of rape, male or female, under any circumstances at any time, irrespective of what the subject may have done.”.
And I’m asking you do you agree or disagree.
A simple “yes” or “no” will suffice.
March 6th, 2009 at 9:25 pm
Your absolutely right hugh, he would have made a terrible prison guard in tripoli, you tell him. As for Gandi, wasnt he the skinny cunt that was always fastin and fuckin with the heads of everyone around him, ah manipulating cunt, I see were your goin…your shrewd hugh, your shrewd and they think your just crazy. Subert this blog subvert, subvert
March 6th, 2009 at 9:55 pm
Hugh, they’re wrong and you’re right.
That’s why they swarm together and attack you on semantics and stuff unrelated to your argument.
Turn around and walk away, thankful that scumbag ideology doesn’t permeate the judicial system as much as they hope or believe it does.
Thank you.
March 6th, 2009 at 11:37 pm
Of course you’re right Hugh.
The thing is that everyone else is right in suggesting that your tone won’t do what you want it to do here.
I heave a bit of a sigh when Twenty posts these posts.
But at the end of the day, the commenters aren’t really vigilantes, they’re just blowing off steam.
Theories about what makes people do wrong do not go down well among the common decent folk here, who do not maim, rape, steal or kill despite the various obstacles that may hav been put in their path.
So far as we know.
Choose your battles, choose your approach with caution…
March 6th, 2009 at 11:48 pm
Welcome Hugh – you certainly livened things up. You cunt.
March 7th, 2009 at 1:54 am
I think that Hugh is actually Twenty just trying to stir things up. Note that with each post, his language becomes more colourful. But I have had a few ales. I love Twenty. Sigh.
March 7th, 2009 at 2:21 am
Anyway, Twenty, I repeat “I do not approve of rape, male or female, under any circumstances at any time, irrespective of what the subject may have done.”.
And I’m asking you do you agree or disagree.
A simple “yes” or “no” will suffice.
You’re asking me to agree with a sentence I didn’t say.
If you’re asking me to say that under no circumstances would I enjoy a man being raped in prison then I won’t do it.
Some of them deserve that, and more. Fuck them. Cunts.
March 7th, 2009 at 3:34 am
I think Hugh chose to not see my point,it’s kind of the way born agains pick the parts of their tome that suit their arguement, He is just lookng for a fight.Ignore him.I have..
March 7th, 2009 at 3:46 am
Right, I’m off to drink beer.
Laters, Naziriños.
Clop!
March 7th, 2009 at 8:32 am
Kill Hugh! he’s a stranger you’ll get away with it, even if you get caught it will be worth it to they rest of us’ he’s only a waffling cunt on someone eles’s high horse.
March 7th, 2009 at 8:56 am
Sorry about that last post. Temporary loss of sanity after I nearly ODed. I’m all right again now.
March 7th, 2009 at 9:45 am
The way I see it, Hugh has got up on his high horse about nothing…Twenty only said they should tear his tea towel holder, the words ‘anal’ and ‘rape’ were never mentioned. Some people have filthy sewers for minds.
I had a shit childhood, but that doesn’t mean it’d be okay for me to batter somebody to death and then try to squirm out of my insubstantial punishment on a technicality.
It’s perfectly understandable that people should feel no sympathy for him, regardless of what prison pleasures he’s subjected to in the future.
And his head is too big for his face.
March 7th, 2009 at 10:11 am
It wasn’t Twenty he was having a go at,twas me.
Anyway,after seeing this “Hugh” http://www.independent.ie/national-news/wife-killer-oreilly-plans-fresh-appeal-1664579.html?from=dailynews ,I hope they get a Train goin on the cunt..
March 7th, 2009 at 10:17 am
I feel much better now. Bit of a sore knob, though, from all that wanking to the thought of fill3rup and magoo cornholing each other.
March 7th, 2009 at 10:18 am
I think it was the lot of yis he was having a go at! On his moral,I’m-so-articulate high horse.
He needs a good shag, I’d say.
Joe O’ Reilly hasn’t got a hope in hell of getting out anyway, he can consider a fresh appeal all he wants. But he is making it very hard for her family to begin to move on.
March 7th, 2009 at 10:19 am
Whatever gets you through the long ,lonely nights Size Ten…
March 7th, 2009 at 10:20 am
I’m a bird, size ten…what should I use to cornhole Fill3rup? I want your wanking material to be just right pet.
March 7th, 2009 at 10:31 am
Magoo:
March 7th, 2009 at 10:20 am
“I’m a bird, size ten…what should I use to cornhole Fill3rup? I want your wanking material to be just right pet.”
Just use the dildo you use on yourself.
Doesn’t it occur to any of you pathetic slobs that you are having the piss taken out of you – quite royally?
March 7th, 2009 at 10:34 am
Why the name change, Hugh?
March 7th, 2009 at 10:58 am
“Twenty Major:
“As he’s going to spent his time, indolent, lazing, growing fat on our taxes, I can understand why people aren’t satisfied with a custodial sentence on its own.”
Fair enough, a very valid sentiment.
However, I believe the main purpose of incarceration should be to protect society from dangerous persons and the secondary purpose possibly, just possibly, to reform and rehabilitate them.
Since we no longer have the death penalty, taxpayers will have to pay for their upkeep in any case and I’m not sure that the overall cost will be greatly affected by whether or not the conditions in which they are kept are humane or inhumane.
If we as a society accept a regime in which prisoners are treated harshly, even sadistically, by prison personnel or other prisoners are allowed to behave brutally towards their fellow-prisoners, then what worries me is hot only the harm this does to some prisoners, but much more the harm it does to ourselves, as a society.
I firmly believe that all punishments meted out to offenders must be enshrined in law. Otherwise, it is mob rule – and we can all see where that leads.
Anyway, Twenty, I repeat “I do not approve of rape, male or female, under any circumstances at any time, irrespective of what the subject may have done.”.
And I’m asking you do you agree or disagree.
A simple “yes” or “no” will suffice.”
Oh god yes, why didn’t I see it before…taking the piss…royally…he even quoted Gandhi. Hilarious altogether.
And I’m not sure about sticking my rampant rabbit up someone else’s arse(for hygiene reasons), but we have a guinea pig?
March 7th, 2009 at 10:58 am
Something ain’t right here, Twenty. Why don’t you check Hugh’s IP?
March 7th, 2009 at 11:02 am
I didn’t say that, I’d never use “ain’t”.
March 7th, 2009 at 11:03 am
But it was a good suggestion all the same.
March 7th, 2009 at 11:20 am
“Blog Comment Policy
All commenters take full responsibility for their comments. Twenty Major is is no way responsible for anything they say. ”
ahem.
March 7th, 2009 at 11:37 am
I’m a bird, size ten
Do you own land ?
March 7th, 2009 at 1:21 pm
Superb blog, mate.
Got the message across beautifully.
March 7th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
The first post with my name on it posted at 8.32, is the only one I posted, and this one, I don’t know who posted the other two, it must be someone who likes my style, it might be Hugh down of someone else’s high horse and onto someone’s soap box, anyway Twenty has it in hand.
March 7th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
Twenty has it in hand.
Open goal!
March 7th, 2009 at 4:18 pm
I hope he gets cunted in the bastard.
March 7th, 2009 at 4:38 pm
When I wrote that Twenty “has it in hand” I meant of course that he is trying to find out who I am impersonating. Only youse with dirty minds will think I mean he is waxing his carrot, choking the chicken, pulling his wire, beating his meat, bashing the bishop …
March 7th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
Just testing something…
March 7th, 2009 at 5:26 pm
Slapping the salami…
March 7th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
So you can put any name and e mail combination and it doesn’t matter…there I was suspecting all sorts.
March 7th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
(SIZE TEN who ever you are?)
Everyone that visits here will now know that you are not the real deal, the terminology you use to describe the act of masturbation is far too original to have been written by me.
PS. HAVE YOU JUST BEEN LET OUT OF SOMEWHERE SECURE?
I think I’ll have to get Gluestain on to you.
March 7th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
size ten, get a hold of yourself, enrich your vocabulary and stop honing your bone
http://www.starma.com/penis/willy/willy.html
Magoo Says:
March 7th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
So you can put any name and e mail combination and it doesn’t matter…there I was suspecting all sorts.
—
Looks like it, so far anyway.
March 8th, 2009 at 1:23 am
Slapping the salami…
Those who know him would know that these days he has a butler to do that sort of thing for him.
March 8th, 2009 at 5:27 pm
Having had a social life this w/end I’ve just read this post now.
I met a beautiful, bright, hilariously funny girl and it never crossed my mind to bash her brains in with a piece of lead.
Am I fucked?
March 8th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
itchybollix Says:
March 8th, 2009 at 5:27 pm
Having had a social life this w/end I’ve just read this post now.
I met a beautiful, bright, hilariously funny girl and it never crossed my mind to bash her brains in with a piece of lead.
Am I fucked?
—
Good for you, itchybollix, I assume you got your hole, then.
Just think, though, if she had led you on and then turned you down and left you with a major case of blue balls and surging hormones, or laughed at your little willy, or …
March 8th, 2009 at 8:48 pm
nope; just a peck on the cheek; I’m old school. evolution of man intends that we desist from violence; especially pre-meditated violence.
March 9th, 2009 at 12:12 am
well,Itchy,obviously as men,we can snap at any time and hugh(who is probably a defence solicitor) thinks that we should understand..well fuck him..he is an idefensible cunt and he can troll here for as long as he wants but he will be ignored..
March 9th, 2009 at 2:28 pm
What’s going on around here?
That comment on 7th march at 6:52pm wasn’t me
March 9th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
Some cunt impersonating people. In fairness, he has you down to a T…
March 9th, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Haha ya prick
March 9th, 2009 at 3:38 pm
That doesn’t surprise me at all, Peadar. What other kinds of videos do you wank to?
The Beverly Callard fitness video is my current favourite
March 11th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
The Beverly Callard fitness video is my current favourite
…Mmmmmmmm…Leathery…