More on the Roscommon abuse case

Sorry to come back to this because it’s hardly cheery stuff, but one of the questions people have been asking about the horrific Roscommon abuse case is ‘Where is/was the father in all this?’.

Someone posted this link as a comment on the original post. From the article:

A HUSBAND and wife have been charged with incest, sexual abuse and with the neglect and cruelty of their six children.

The married couple were arrested yesterday morning and brought before Castlerea District Court. The two, who cannot be named for legal reasons, face 40 charges between them in relation to the neglect, cruelty and sexual abuse of the children.

The man … was charged yesterday with 26 charges in relation to the neglect, cruelty and sexual abuse of the six children.

I guess that answers the question.

Similar posts

  • No Related Post
Tags:

10 Responses to More on the Roscommon abuse case

  1. Jo says:

    Our very own Wests. I wonder if they’ve checked under the garden.

  2. SAm Crea says:

    I havent read anything about this case for the same reason as I have abandoned Naked lunch on page 69.. There is some shit we just dont need to read..

  3. Conan Drumm says:

    Yup, before the courts in due course.

    Btw, HSE have acknowledged contact with the family since 1989.

  4. Whiskeyintheditch says:

    It answers the question, where he was. But where is he now?

  5. starf**ker says:

    from page 69 of naked lunch “they leap on guests like bitch dogs in heat with rabies”

  6. Sweary says:

    1989?! The wheels of the HSE grind slowly… sure sometimes you wouldn’t think they were moving at all at all!

  7. divneymathers says:

    Funny how the meeja focused solely on the Mother.

  8. Fill3rup says:

    Its possible there were restrictions on reporting of the Father as his case was not being heard..

  9. Conan Drumm says:

    The guilty plea kept many of the facts out of the public domain and made it unnecessary to mention any other parties, which might have prejudiced the outcome of any other case. I would advise absolute caution about this. Even the worst of the tabloids have observed reporting restrictions, for good reason.

  10. Twenty Major says:

    The information is in the public domain but I think you’re right. It might be best to close comments for now.